Look, we're not gonna pretend there's some magic formula here. Just honest work, smart choices, and a lot of testing what actually works in the field.
After fifteen years working on industrial buildings and heritage restorations across BC, I've learned that sustainability isn't about checking boxes or slapping solar panels on everything. It's about understanding what a building actually needs and what it can realistically deliver.
Sometimes that means keeping a 100-year-old concrete foundation instead of pouring a new one. Sometimes it's convincing a client that triple-pane windows aren't overkill in Vancouver's climate. And yeah, sometimes it means saying no to ideas that look great on paper but won't survive their first winter.
We've screwed up, learned from it, and built our approach from those lessons. That's the honest truth of it.
These aren't theoretical principles we dreamed up in a conference room. They're what we genuinely apply on every project because they work.
The most sustainable material is the one that's already on site. We've salvaged everything from old-growth timber beams to original brick facades. Costs less, builds faster, and honestly? Usually looks better than new stuff trying to fake character.
We do the modeling and the thermal imaging and all that technical stuff because it matters. But we're measuring real energy consumption, actual water use, genuine indoor air quality. If it doesn't perform in the real world, what's the point?
A building that people hate using isn't sustainable, period. We design spaces that work for the folks who'll actually spend 40+ hours a week there. Good daylighting, proper ventilation, spaces that make sense. Not rocket science, but you'd be surprised how often it gets forgotten.
We source BC timber when we can, work with Vancouver trades we trust, and use materials that don't need to be shipped from halfway around the world. Supports the local economy and cuts down on the carbon footprint from transportation. Win-win.
The least sustainable building is one that needs replacing in 20 years. We design for a minimum 75-year lifespan, with systems that can be upgraded without gutting the whole place. Simple concept, harder to execute than you'd think.
If the payback period is 30 years, we're honest about it. We run the numbers on energy savings, maintenance costs, tax incentives. Sometimes green costs more upfront. Sometimes it saves money from day one. Either way, you'll know what you're getting into.
We've done LEED Gold, Passive House, BOMA BEST, and Living Building Challenge projects. The certifications can be valuable - they push you to consider stuff you might've missed and give clients third-party validation.
But here's the thing: the certificate isn't the goal. The goal is a building that performs well, costs less to operate, and makes people want to be there. Sometimes those align perfectly with certification requirements. Sometimes they don't.
Accredited professionals on staff
Certified consultants
Ready buildings designed
Code compliance experts
We're not huge on bragging, but these are measurable outcomes from projects we've completed. Your mileage may vary, obviously.
Average energy reduction in our industrial retrofits
Material reuse rate on heritage projects
Average payback period for efficiency upgrades
Construction waste diverted from landfills
Sustainability isn't static. We're constantly testing new approaches, materials, and technologies. Here's what's currently on our radar:
We're working with BC mass timber suppliers to see where CLT and glulam can replace steel and concrete in warehouse and manufacturing spaces. Early results are promising, but there's still work to do on fire ratings and long-span applications.
Standard energy modeling software doesn't handle old buildings well. We're developing custom approaches that account for thermal mass, air infiltration patterns, and heritage material properties. It's tedious work, but it leads to better retrofit strategies.
Vancouver gets plenty of rain - might as well use it. We're designing rainwater capture and treatment systems sized for industrial process water needs. Not drinking water quality, but good enough for cooling systems, washdown, and landscaping.
Every project's different. If you've got a building that needs work and you're wondering what's actually possible versus what's just greenwashing, let's talk. We'll give you straight answers based on what we've seen work in the field.
No point reinventing the wheel. Here are organizations and resources that've helped us figure stuff out over the years.
LEED certifications and green building education. They host decent workshops in Vancouver a few times a year.
Technical resources and training for high-performance building envelopes. Their detailing guides have saved us countless headaches.
Energy modeling tools and incentive programs. Worth checking before any major retrofit project.
Research on Canadian wood products and mass timber applications. Good data on structural performance and carbon sequestration.
Lifecycle assessment tools and material databases. Helps quantify the carbon impact of material choices.
Technical guidance on heritage building conservation and sustainable retrofit strategies that respect original character.